Mission Health’s $400 million project

headphonehospital.png

Earlier this month, Mission Health announced that it will end its contract with Blue Cross Blue Shield NC in October. We promised we’d keep you in the loop on some of the reasons why this is happening — so here we go. 

First thing on the list to discuss? Mission Health’s $400 million reconstruction project. (Fun Fact: The entire value of the Biltmore Estate, including all the hotels, restaurants and other buildings is only $300 million. How’s that for perspective?)

So, why the heavy chunk of change?

In 2015 the City of Asheville approved a site-plan for a 12-story, 681,000 square-foot Mission Health medical tower. It will include new operating rooms and an emergency department and could potentially be the largest construction project in Asheville — ever.

Sonya Greck, Mission’s senior vice president of Patient Safety Net Services and Behavioral Health, said that it was “quite obvious... that the (current) St. Joe’s facility was aging out, as well as there were needs for our emergency department.”

The construction should be finished by November 2018.


 Read More: 

Mission Health's Full Page Ad Really Says "You Pay Too Little"


What does this have to do with why Mission terminated its Blue Cross contract?

We’re glad you asked.

As we explained previously, Mission Health wanted to raise its rates based on the hospital’s need to raise revenue, however, Blue Cross pushed back on rate hikes for fear that they would cause unreasonable hikes in patient premiums. (You can read all the dirty details here.)

The parties couldn’t come to an agreement, so Mission health said buh-bye — but “did not make the decision lightly.”

Mission Health said it has already taken “difficult steps of ongoing, aggressive cost reductions,” and that it is committed to strong financial stewardship.

“Between 2014 and 2018, Mission Health will have eliminated more than $240 million in costs, including $70 million in reductions in FY2017 alone. Adding BCBSNC’s effective payment reductions to this already arduous task is simply not possible,” it said in a press release.

Mission Health, like many hospitals around the nation, wrestles with the financial burden of keeping a hospital up and running. (Annual costs for healthcare in the US have soared to over $10,000 per person!) We get it — running a hospital is hard and expensive.

Mission’s $400 million reconstruction project is intended to update and expand the hospital’s level, ability, and quality of care to patients. But it would result in higher costs for patients, too.

Let’s get into the pros and cons.

How Mission’s reconstruction project could benefit you

How Mission’s reconstruction project could cost you

  • Patients would face higher premiums and/or costs as a result. Why? Because the funding has to come from someone, and that someone is you. If you think the $400 million is coming from the City of Asheville, you wouldn’t be wrong — but taxpayers contribute to state and city expenditures like education, law enforcement, highways, and healthcare. (So, if you’re a taxpayer in Asheville, this means you’re helping to pay for the city’s development projects — including Mission’s new medical tower.)
  • The new medical tower will be part of Mission’s future operating costs, as well as a harbor for medical supplies, pharmaceuticals, and Mission employees — all things Mission cited as reasons for its push for rate increases. Charles Ayscue, Mission’s senior vice president of finance and CFO, said, “It’s simply impossible to keep up with rising medical supply, pharmaceutical, and other operating costs, let alone provide future wage increases to our fantastic team members without appropriate annual adjustments to our payment rates from BCBSNC in the coming years.” The medical tower will understandably, but inevitably contribute to Mission’s need for annual increases.

Mission stated in a press release that its “notice of intent to terminate its contracts (with Blue Cross) shouldn’t be a barrier, but rather bring needed focus to (its) discussions.” So, let’s have a conversation — what do you think about Mission’s $400 million reconstruction project? Do you think Asheville patients need this updated facility? Do you agree it will contribute to higher rates for patients? Tell us on Facebook or in the comments.

Are you concerned about rising health care costs? Join our coalition to help make a difference and stay informed about the local, state and national issues that are costing you. 

 

Showing 4 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • commented 2017-09-29 06:31:13 -0400
    I’m extremely curious as to how an advertising campaign by a health insurance company made it’s way connected to the site it is.
    The simple truth is that Mission is the regional trauma center and unlike the other two hospitals that BCBS is comparing it to, Mission is the regional trauma center! It’s where all the multi-million dollar patients get flown to. And I don’t mean Mission makes millions off them, they leave the hospital leaving a multi-million dollar bill and have no insurance! The bill for the uninsured, WE pay for. The same for Medicaid patients, the State pays almost enough to feed a patient a day but the care a Medicaid patient receives is also paid for by those of us with health insurance.
    What the ACA would end, if the Republicans would look after the country the way they look after their stock portfolio
    Speaking of which, BCBS is STILL raising rates, just as much as the ACA will allow them to.
    And in all honesty, when open season happens in a couple of weeks, BCBS is history for us, we have another plan from a different company, THAT WILL PAY BETTER AND COSTS LESS!
  • commented 2017-07-23 19:02:00 -0400
    The only problem I’ve had with Mission was the parking. In January of 2016 my 55 year old sister had emergency brain surgery. The staff was very good,several clergy personnel was very helpful in moving the family from one waiting room to another. I will always be grateful for the kindness. I am a BCBS member so I want be using Mission for financial reason’s.
  • commented 2017-07-23 07:06:16 -0400
    Continues from first comment: I went to inquire about the charge and was told it was the standard fee for FB removal. The tetanus shot was 229.00 and the fee to stick it in my arm?? 71.50. This is entirely an abuse of the medical billing industry. I am willing to pay for things that are actually done, not this. Anyone else have a similar story? would love to hear it.
  • commented 2017-07-23 07:02:21 -0400
    Here is an example of what is wrong with the medical industry in this country. Last month I got a fish hook stuck in my finger, I could not remove it. I drove myself to Blue Ridge Hospital’s emergency room (it was after hours) so I knew there was going to be that expensive tab (759.00) for the actual emergency visit. A Dr on duty came into the room and introduced himself, and called for lidocaine and such: a PA rushed in and said he wanted to try something if I was agreeable, less is more he said. Of course I agreed. He then proceeded to show me how to yank a hook out of my finger with a string or cord, put some betadine on it, a tetanus shot and I was good to go. Imagine my surprise when the bill rolled in and it included a 693.00 surgical services charge, even tho no surgery was performed

connect

Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.